Druckschrift 
Crime and punishment in Jewish law : essays and responsa / edited by Walter Jacob and Moshe Zemer
Entstehung
Seite
110
Einzelbild herunterladen

110 Selected Reform Responsi

who were self-destructive or eccentric(Git . 78a; J. Ter. 40b). It was ultimately left to the judges to assess the situation and make a judgement according to the evidence in each case(Yad Hil Edut. 9.9). In order to assure an appropriate decision, the judges were required to possess some knowledge of all the sciences including medicine(Yad Hil. San. 2.1).

Those temporarily insane are not considered liable for acts performed during periods of insanity. However, during times of lucidity, they are liable and could also act as witnesses(Tos. Tet 1.3; J. Ter. 40b; B. B. 128a; Yad Hil. Mekh. 29; Shulhan Arukh Hoshen Mishpat 235.23). The court must decide whether an act has been committed in a period of insanity or lucidity. Further more, an individual so intoxicated as to be totally unaware of his actions is considered temporarily insane, and is treated accord: ingly by the court(Er. 75a; Yad Hil. Ishut 4.18). The cases cited in the responsa literature, however, deal with betrothal and mar riage, not criminal acts.

Although some guidelines have been mentioned, they ar vague and the decision of temporary insanity is left to the court Individuals who are considered totally insane are not liable for any act which they may commit.

Unknown Defect in Building Material

Contemporary American Reform Responsa(New York , 1987),#11

Walter Jacob

QUESTION: Our sanctuary and social hall contain asbestos ties in their ceilings. The congregation is planning on removing ther At the last board meeting a directive was passed instructing gil legal committee to file proceedings against an asbestos man pe

turer. Is it moral to bring a liability suit against a manufact®