mentioned are Tosafot, Nidah 44a-b, s.v. thu(scribal error) and Responsa Maharit, n. 99(forgery).
37. Responsa Tzitz Eliezer, XIV, n. 100. 38. Responsa Tzitz Eliezer, XV, n. 45.
39. On the role of subjectivity in rabbinic decision see Avraham Rabinowitz, Techumin, 2, 1981, pp. 504-512. The weakness of Waldenberg ’s legal argument is emphasized by the fact that R. Ovadyah Yosef permits in-vitro fertilization and regards the child as the offspring of its father and mother in all respects. See M. Drori in Techumin, 1, 1980, pp. 287-288.
40. See the list of"rov minyan verov binyan shel haposkim" in A. S. Avraham, Nishmat Avraham, Yoreh Deah, p. 256.
41. Responsa Mishpetei Uziel, Yoreh Deah, n. 28.
42. Dr. Yaakov Levy in Sefer Assya, Jerusalem , 1, 1982, p. 207. Kook’s responsum is found in Responsa Dat Kohen, n. 199. One can hear the sigh of relief emanating from these writings when they stress that autopsy is no longer as important in medical education as it used to be; see Nishmat Avraham, loc. cit.
51