Druckschrift 
The internet revolution and Jewish law / edited by Walter Jacob
Seite
83
Einzelbild herunterladen

Internet, Privacy , and Progressive Halakhah 83

There are, to be sure, some weighty reasons for pessimism. For one thing, despite all the praise rendered untoprivacy in the public discourse, it is far from clear that society values that concept to an extent that would motivate the adoption of real protections and reforms. Philosophers and legal theorists, as we shall see, continue to debate the very existence of aright to privacy that would demand safeguarding. Even if we concede the existence of such a right, it is arguable that we ourselves have largely waived anyreasonable expectation of privacy'' by so fully opening ourselves to the digital world. When we conduct so much of our legal, commercial, and social activity online, the argument goes, we implicitly accept upon ourselves the risk that our personal data will be exposed to the gaze of others, particularly if the technology we so eagerly adopt renders that exposure well­nigh inevitable. If citizens have only themselves to blame for their loss of privacy, in other words, then perhaps their privacy was no so dear to them in the first place.

In this article, I want to explore the web(pun intended) of issues connected withInternet privacy from the standpoint of Jewish law and particularly from that of what the participants in this volume would callprogressive halakhah." In general, I want to inquire as to the range of responses that we are called upon to make: what sort of teaching should liberal Judaism offer to its communicants in the name of Torah , that is to say from the textual tradition through whichTorah has always been expressed? To do so, I will need to confront the very real possibility that the Jewish tradition has nothing of any substance to say. While it should be obvious that the ancient and medieval texts do not mention the Internet, it is of even greater consequence that the concepts of rights andprivacy are also absent from the sources. Jewish legal discourse does not speak the language ofrights, by which we mean the expectations and protections that the individual can legitimately demand from the societys legal machinery, but rather that ofduties andobligations.'* Nor does Jewish law mention privacy as an independent concept; nowhere in the classical halakhic sources do we read of a duty incumbent upon an