Napoleon's Sanhedrin and the Halakhah 61

94. Leopold Loew ;“Eherechtliche Studien,” Gesammelte Schriften, Szegedin , 1889, Vol. 3, pp. 138 ff.

95. Victor Tcherikover , Hellenistic Civilization and the Jews, New York , 1970, p. 70.

96. Boaz Cohen , Jewish and Roman Law, Vol. 1, pp. 339f. 97. B. Lewin, Otzar Hage-onim; Yev. 48b: Kid. 22b, 66b, 68b, etc.

98. Szajkowski, pp. 826ff) E. Schnurmann, La population juive en Alsace , pp. 871; N. Samter, Judentaufen im Neunzehnten Jahrhundert, pp. 86fT.

99. A. Ruppin , Die Juden der Gegenwart, Leipzig, 1911, pp. 157ft.

100. Ibid., p. 159.

101. Leopold Loew ,“Eherechtliche Studien,”(Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 3, pp. 194ff

102. Maslin, pp. 21 ff.

103. A. Shohet,“The German Jew, His Integration Within Their Non-Jewish Environment in the First Half of the Eighteenth Century” Zion, Vol. 21, 1956, pp. 229 ff.; Moses Mendlelssohn“Schreiben an Lavater,” Schriften, 1843, Vol. 3, pp. 39 ff.

104. Berkowitz pp. 126 ff. He provides a summary of the development of the Jewish understanding of Christianity.

105. Elfenbein Teshuvot Rashi, New York , 1947..

106. See p. 44.

107. Maslin, pp. 6ff; 16 ff.

108. Tama, p. 142 ff. Here, early in the discussions the rabbis with support from

other delegates insisted on their authority. After several brief adjournments it became clear that they would be consulted, but not have a final voice.