Druckschrift 
Rabbinic-lay relations in Jewish law / edited by Walter Jacob and Moshe Zemer
Seite
119
Einzelbild herunterladen

MINHAG AND HALAKHAH

the"naturalization" of minhag and the expansion of halakhah, so too can conversation between rabbi and ritual committee be a source of religious growth and development in a congregation. All that is required is a laity willing to examine its customs openly and honestly, a rabbi able to interpret Torah in all its fullness and intricacy, and a readiness on all sides to teach and learn from each other.

Notes

1. This factor is not limited to liberal congregations. Numerous"orthodox" synagogues of a previous generation resolved knotty ritual controversies--such as the battle over mixed seating--by submitting them to a vote of the membership rather than to the binding halakhic decision of the rabbi.

2. On the"legal sources of Jewish law," see the comprehensive treatment by Menachem Elon , Hamishpat Ha-Ivri, Jerusalem , 1978. His discussion of minhag is found on pp. 713-767.

3. To be legally obligatory, a minhag must be"a common practice, performed frequently,(Isserles , Shulhan Arukh, Hoshen Mishpat 331.1), and officially declared by the community's scholars to be the accepted practice(Arukh Hashulhan, Hoshen Mishpat 331#5).

4. See the rules and qualifications discussed in R. Haim Hizkiah Medini, Sdei Hemed, V. 4, pp. 74-109.

5. On the relationship between jus cogens and jus dispositivum in Jewish law, see Elon, op.cit., pp. 158-163. The right to stipulate against the rules of monetary law in the Torah was developed during the Tanaitic period and accepted by the Amoraim ; see M. Ketubot 9.1, Tosefta Qidushin 3.7-8, Ketubot 83b-84a; Rambam , Yad, Ishut 12.6-9. within these lines, a commercial minhag is a form of community stipulation which annuls conflicting Toraitic prescriptions; see M. Baba Metzia 7.1 and the accompanying sugyd in the Yerushalmi.

119