MARK WASHOFSKY
76. Hart 's term for"realists"; Concept of Law, pp. 132 ff.
77. Roscoe Pound ,"Mechanical Jurisprudence," Columbia Law Review, Vol. 8, 1908, pp. 605-623. 78. G. Edward White , The American Judicial Tradition, New York , 1976, pp. 196-198.
80. Frederick Schauer ,"Easy Cases," Southern California Law Review, Vol. 58, 1985, pp. 399-440; Ken Kress,"Legal Indeterminacy, " California Law Review, Vol. 77, 1989, pp. 283-327.
81. See Benjamin Cardozo , The Nature of the Judicial Process, New Haven , 1921; Henry M. Hart, Jr.
, and Albert Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law, Cambridge , MA , tentative edition, 1958;(on the doctrine of"process jurisprudence", which stressed, contra the realists, the institutional limitations upon judges, see G. Edward White ,"The Evolution of Reasoned Elaboration," Virginia Law Review, Vol. 59, pp. 2791f.; Owen Fiss ,"Objectivity and Interpretation," Stanford Law Review, Vol. 34, 1982, pp. 739-763, and"Conventionalism, " Southern California Law Review, Vol. 58, 1985, pp. 177-197.
82. Herbert Wechsler ,"Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law," Harvard Law Review, Vol. 73, 1959, pp. 1-35.
84. Ronald Dworkin , Law's Empire, Cambridge , MA , 1986; A Matter of Principle, Cambridge , MA , 1985; and Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge , MA , 1977.
85. See the discussion by Robin West,"Disciplines, Subjectivity, and Law," in A. Sarat and T. Kearns, The Fate of Law, Ann Arbor , 1991, pp. 119ff. and the literature she cites.
86. See many of the collected essays in Marshall Cohen, ed., Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence, London , 1983; Ken Kress,"The Interpretive Tum," Ethics, vol. 97, 1987, pp. 834-860; H.L.A. Hart , Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Oxford, 1983, pp. 137-144; Kent Greenawalt , Law and Objectivity, New York , 1992, pp. 217ff.; Aharon Barak , Judicial Discretion, New Haven , 1987, pp. 28-33.
87. Posner , Problems of Jurisprudence, pp. 21-23; Richard Rorty ,"The Banality of Pragmatism and the Poetry of Justice," Southern California Law Review, Vol. 63, 1990, pp. 1811ff.
89. On the movement in general, see Mark Kelman , A Guide to Critical Legal Studies, Cambridge , MA , 1987, David Kairys , ed., The Politics of Law, New York , 1982; and Roberto Mangabeira Unger , The Critical Legal Studies Movement, Cambridge , MA , 1986. On the issues of legal formalism and
85