Druckschrift 
Gender issues in Jewish law : essays and responsa / edited by Walter Jacob and Moshe Zemer
Entstehung
Seite
224
Einzelbild herunterladen

224 Selected Reform Responsa

(Tos., Yev. 8), although some later authorities would include women in the obligation, perhaps in a secondary sense(Arukh Hashulhan, Even Ha-ezer 1.4; Hatam Sofer , Even Ha-ezer,#20). Abraham Hirsh (Noam, Vol. 16, pp. 152ff) has recently discussed the matter of granting a divorce when one spouse has had a transsexual oper­ation. Aside from opposing the operation generally, he also states that no essential biological changes have taken place and that the operation therefore, was akin to sterilization(which is prohib­ited) and cosmetic surgery. Hirsh also mentions a case related to our situation. A male in the time of R. Hananel added an orifice to his body, and R. Hananel decided that a male having intercourse with this individual has committed a homosexual act. This state­ment is quoted by Ibn Ezra in his commentary on Lev. 18:22. We, however, are not dealing with this kind of situation, but with a complete sexual change operation.

Despite the strong emphasis on procreation, companionship and joy also played a major role in the Jewish concept of marriage. Thus, the seven marriage blessings deal with joy, companionship, the unity of family, restoration of Zion, etc., as well as with chil­dren(Ket. 8a). These same blessings were to be recited for those beyond child-bearing age, or those who were sterile(Abudarham , Birkhot Erusin 98a).

Most traditional authorities who discussed childless mar­riages were considering a marriage already in existence(bedi­avad) and not the entrance into such a union. Under such circumstances the marriage would be considered valid and need not result in divorce for the sake of procreation, although that possibility existed(Shulhan Arukh Even Ha-ezer 23; see Isserles note on 154.10). This was the only alternative solution, since bigamy was no longer even theoretically possible after the decree of Rabbenu Gershom in the 11th century in those countries where

this decree was accepted(oriental Jews did not accept the Herem of Rabbenu Gershom ). Maimonides considered such a marriage valid under any circumstances(Yad, Hil. Ishut 4.10), whether this

individual was born sterile or was sterilized later. The commen­tator, Abraham di Boton, emphasized the validity of such a mar­riage if sterility has been caused by an accident or surgery(Lehem Mishneh to Yad, Hil. Ishut 4.10). Yair Hayyim Bacharach stated that as long as the prospective wife realized that her prospective hus­