Druckschrift 
Gender issues in Jewish law : essays and responsa / edited by Walter Jacob and Moshe Zemer
Entstehung
Seite
163
Einzelbild herunterladen

Progressive Halakhah and Homosexual Marriage

163

The Responsa Committee has received many requests to affirm the use of creative, private religious ceremonies. Some of these have no roots in Jewish tradition or theology. A mohel was asked to officiate at the berit milah of the child of a mixed mar­riage. The mother is Jewish , the father a believing Catholic. They have requested that the child have a berit and then be baptized. The child is to be educated in both religious traditions.

The responsum, given by Walter Jacob , stated that the cir­cumcision and synagogue education would only lead to the con­fusion of the child. The mohel is not to proceed with the berit.?>

In another situation, a rabbi, who serves a New England community, has received a request to participate in the annual ceremony ofblessing the fleet with the Christian clergy of the area. After a thorough analysis, this interfaith ceremony, was revealed to be a sort of Christian ritual, and finding that there is no precedent for blessing things in Jewish tradition, the Responsa Committee responded in the negative. We can under­stand from this that not every creative ritual and ceremony may be accepted as properly Jewish .

Nevertheless, if a same-sex couple and the rabbi must choose between a same-sex marriage or a commitment ceremony and cannot avoid either alternative, they should choose the latter. The marriage ceremony can be considered a violation of Jewish Law; the commitment ceremony might be prohibited because it gives the appearance of a wedding ceremony. Neither has any justification in Jewish law and tradition. Of the two, the wedding ceremony is a more serious violation of Jewish law.

The Rabbi , the State and the Marriage

A Reform rabbi and a professor posted the following on the Hebrew Union College alumni internet forum:However, the fact remains that in New York State , among others, it is against the law. to perform a gay/lesbian marriage. If I perform one, I am breaking the law. If I perform some other sort of ceremony which appears to be a wedding but in factis nota wedding,[ am giving the appearance of breaking the law. These are not, in my

thinking, trifling matters.